A Daily Network publication
Explore the network
Private Infrastructure Daily
Independent Intelligence on Infrastructure Capital
Sunday, October 11, 2026The Morning Brief →Sign in
Capital

Goldman, Macquarie close infrastructure funds below target

The two vehicles raised $4.7bn against a $13.5bn ask, a sign that LPs have stopped buying big blind-pool infrastructure mandates.

At a glance

30-second brief
  • The two vehicles raised $4.7bn against a $13.5bn ask, a sign that LPs have stopped buying big blind-pool infrastructure mandates.

  • According to Infrastructure Investor, Goldman Sachs and Macquarie have both closed their Infrastructure Partners II vehicles at less than half their original targets, leaving two of the sector's strongest brands with a combined $4.7bn on a $13.5bn ask.

  • Goldman Sachs Infrastructure Partners II closed with $3.1bn in commitments against a $7.5bn target, or 41% of the goal; Macquarie Infrastructure Partners II pulled in $1.6bn of a $6bn target, roughly 27%.

According to Infrastructure Investor, Goldman Sachs and Macquarie have both closed their Infrastructure Partners II vehicles at less than half their original targets, leaving two of the sector's strongest brands with a combined $4.7bn on a $13.5bn ask. That shortfall says as much about the ceiling on unlisted infrastructure fundraising as it does about either firm's standing.

Goldman Sachs Infrastructure Partners II closed with $3.1bn in commitments against a $7.5bn target, or 41% of the goal; Macquarie Infrastructure Partners II pulled in $1.6bn of a $6bn target, roughly 27%. In absolute terms neither vehicle is a disappointment—$3.1bn is a headline close for most managers and $1.6bn is a real pool of capital—but the proportions tell the harder story: Goldman raised less than half of what it wanted and Macquarie less than a third.

By 2017 the big blind-pool infrastructure mandate was already falling out of favor; LPs were willing to write checks to Goldman and Macquarie but less willing to write multibillion-dollar checks to a name and a strategy memo. The infrastructure pitch had moved toward identifiable, cash-flowing assets, the kind a limited partner can underwrite and hold; a generalist fund asks for ten years of discretion instead, and these two closes put a price on that trust.

Macquarie's behavior since then points the same way. As this publication has reported, the firm sold its Polish fiber assets to fund a data-center push, an exit-and-recycle strategy suited to a platform that raised barely a quarter of its original target. The sale turned a mature asset into growth capital—a concrete example of the recycling loop large infrastructure managers have come to rely on. When the market won't fund the whole plan, the plan has to fund itself. Infrastructure Investor's report does not say which investors committed to either fund or when the final closes took place.

Neither firm is out of the infrastructure business, but a brand alone no longer carries a vehicle to its original size. The next large infrastructure vintage will have to open its pitch with the asset and its contracted cash flow, not the manager's history.

Infrastructure fund closes: commitments vs. original targets
Goldman Sachs – target$7.5BN
Macquarie – target$6BN
Goldman Sachs – raised$3.1BN
Macquarie – raised$1.6BN
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR
Continue your research

Save this analysis and keep the funds you follow together in My Desk.

Sign in to save articles or follow funds.
Sources & further reading
Infrastructure Investor · Private Infrastructure Daily archive
More from Private Infrastructure Daily
Capital

Wind Estate's GBP 60m NatWest loan lacks tenor, margin and asset detail

The Renewables Now report names the borrower and lender but does not say how many projects the money covers or whether it refinances or builds.
Capital

U.S. Bank's Tim Keller says rising rates complicate utility capital spending

Utilities are seeking backup bank financing as the Department of Energy pulls back from certain loans, while higher rates add pressure, U.S. Bank's Tim Keller says.
The Wrap

DOE offers Vistra a $4.2 billion conditional loan for 433 MW of nuclear uprates

The commitment is tied to Vistra's 2.6-gigawatt Meta agreement and would preserve roughly 4 gigawatts of PJM nuclear, with funding awaiting technical, legal, environmental and financial reviews.
Elsewhere in the networkAll titles →
Every weekday · 6:30 a.m. ET

The Morning Brief

The latest from Private Infrastructure Daily, in your inbox every weekday. Free.