A Daily Network publication
Explore the network
Private Infrastructure Daily
Independent Intelligence on Infrastructure Capital
Thursday, September 24, 2026The Morning Brief →Sign in
Energy Transition

Woodway is selling a 2028 delivery date, not molecules

The offtaker is unnamed and no term is disclosed, which is the point: what a data center buys when the queue runs to the 2030s is time, and it is priced in the dark.

Woodway Energy Infrastructure will build a 22-mile, 30-inch natural gas pipeline to supply a US data center behind the meter, the Houston developer said, with commercial service expected in the first half of 2028 subject to customary regulatory reviews and approvals. Mileage and diameter are the easy numbers in the announcement; the load-bearing one is the date, because interconnection queues stretch into the 2030s according to Data Center Dynamics, and a developer promising fuel in 2028 is selling a schedule as much as a molecule.

The structure is the one midstream companies have been circling, in which a developer builds a dedicated line to the fence and the customer burns the gas on its own side of the meter rather than wait on a utility extension or a generator's place in the queue. Woodway fits the mold: founded in 2020, backed by Macquarie Capital Principal Finance, and a developer, owner and operator of intrastate gas pipelines whose chief executive, Diaco Aviki, describes a model pairing tailored design and speed with long-term ownership and operation, including 24/7 control room monitoring on this line; the company says the pipeline is built around the customer's specific requirements and carries an option to extend it.

Read the two dates against each other and the product comes into focus: a queue that clears in the 2030s cannot serve a building that wants to energize in 2028, so the customer is buying supply outside the interconnection queue rather than a better place inside it. That inference rests on two disclosed facts and nothing more — the in-service target and the queue's length — and it explains why the seller is a pipeline developer rather than a utility.

What the announcement withholds is the set of terms that ordinarily gets a pipeline financed: the customer's identity, the line's location, the contract's duration, the contracted volume, the price of the gas. The coverage does not say how much fuel the data center will burn, which would tell a reader whether 30 inches of pipe is sized for one campus or for the extension option the company mentions, nor where the line begins, what it connects to at the supply end, or which state it crosses.

Woodway is not alone in chasing this customer, as midstream companies have been proposing pipeline extensions to feed data centers behind the meter drawn by load that cannot wait for the queue to clear; the competitive question is less who can build the biggest line than who can commit to a date. A 2020-vintage platform backed by a bank's principal finance arm is a credible answer, and the company says it intends to own and operate the asset for the long term rather than exit at completion.

Two gas deals, two different silences

The nearest comparison landed earlier the same week, when New Era Energy & Digital signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Luminant, a Vistra subsidiary, for power delivered directly from a 1.1GW gas-fired plant in Odessa, Texas. That contract named the counterparty and fixed the term; it left the price column blank, while Woodway's announcement blanks more of the page — no counterparty, no term, no volume, no price — so of the two gas-for-compute deals announced in one week, only one gives a lender enough to start a credit conversation.

The two routes to the same molecule differ in more than paperwork: New Era is buying output from a plant someone else built and will operate, while Woodway's customer is buying a dedicated line the developer will own and run. The first needed no new midstream construction, which likely is what made it signable on a short clock; the second buys control over fuel delivery and, with the extension option, room to add load without reopening an agreement from scratch. Which structure a customer prefers is legible even with the numbers hidden.

A pipeline is a credit instrument with steel wrapped around it, and the instruments are the parts missing from the announcement. That is less alarming for a sponsor-backed developer than for a project-financed one: Macquarie's balance sheet can carry development cost while the commercial terms stay private, where a developer dependent on a lender would need a contract in hand before progressing. What gets priced later is the counterparty's credit and the contract's duration, on 22 miles of pipe built for one customer, and neither is knowable today.

Permission is still the product

Behind the meter does not mean beyond review: Woodway's own language puts the 2028 in-service date behind customary regulatory reviews and approvals, and while the coverage does not say which state the line crosses, some version of that gauntlet applies wherever it lands. In every data center trade, consent is the product, and Texas supplies the working example: Abbott's August halt on data center permits tied the state's projects to an ownership audit, and 49.8GW of Texas projects now wait on a December deadline that has nothing to do with turbines or transformers. The behind-the-meter structure sidesteps the interconnection queue while leaving the pipeline permit, the air permit and the local land file exactly where they were.

Anonymity has a mundane reading worth airing: data center customers often keep a site quiet until land is closed, and a private developer owes the market nothing beyond what a regulator requires, so the silence about the offtaker is likely the customer's preference rather than evidence of a weak contract. The pattern still matters, as two gas-for-compute deals in one week both priced off documents nobody outside the transaction can read, with the second one redacting the name at the top of the page along with the number at the bottom.

The unpriced energy deal has seen the blank price column move from projects to fund managers and now sit on the cap table, and Woodway pushes the blank up one more level, to the counterparty itself — the first input of any credit and the one a lender cannot underwrite around. Watch for the terms to surface somewhere with a filing requirement attached, a financing or a docket or a local permit, because one of those documents will likely arrive before the gas does.

Sources & further reading
Data Center Dynamics
More from Private Infrastructure Daily
Energy Transition

Sunrun and Tesla's 580 MW home-battery dispatch still has no price attached

A California residential fleet ran as a single grid resource, and the coverage never carries the compensation number that would make the record underwritable.
The Wrap

The permit is now the power contract

California, Texas and Australia are writing water, load and grid-cost terms into local approvals, so capacity gets announced before anyone prices the project.
Capital

Grid access is being optioned, not pooled

Two energy Form Ds worth $3.2 million of offering paper, one of them empty, landed in a week when three corporate contracts moved power rights with no fund in the middle.
Elsewhere in the networkAll titles →
Every weekday · 6:30 a.m. ET

The Morning Brief

The private wealth industry in four minutes, every weekday at 6:30 a.m. ET. Free.