DCD Connect London report puts grid access ahead of capital
The report, drawn from 48 hours and more than 4,000 attendees, names supply chain, grid access and social license as the constraints that now stop European projects.
DCD Intelligence published its DCD Connect London report on 6 October, condensing 48 hours of programming and more than 4,000 senior leaders into six takeaways aimed at the European market. The extract released alongside it ranks supply chain, grid access, and social license to build ahead of capital, and says the shift away from capital as the constraint that stops a project happened "decisively." It attaches no figure to the trio and does not enumerate the takeaways, but the ranking is the finding: three obstacles, none of them the cost of money.
If capital has stopped being the gate, the diligence that decides a project sits upstream of the asset—in the interconnection position, the utility's timeline, and local consent—and an underwriting file assembled around financing terms answers a question the market has stopped asking. A site with a signed lease and no grid date is a site with an option, not a pipeline.
The claim also lines up with an argument this publication has made in its coverage of New York's moratorium, where consent, rather than capital, now decides what gets built. DCD's trio stretches that logic to the other two things a developer can queue for but cannot accelerate, without disturbing the capital hierarchy of digital infrastructure, in which anchor tenants set the price of money and tenantless development is underwritten as a different, junior asset. For a developer whose utility has not confirmed a date, the market-level hierarchy is academic.
The list omits the industry's staffing shortage
Labor is missing from the trio. In September, more than two-thirds of developers and operators described staffing below what their halls require, with the scarcest skills being the ones that turn a queue position into a running megawatt. The published extract does not say whether the London sessions folded that shortage into supply chain or left it off the list entirely.
The six takeaways hold the answer, and it matters beyond bookkeeping. A market that has stopped treating capital as the binding constraint has moved the work of underwriting from the term sheet to the queue, the utility, and the neighbors. If the industry's own accounting of what stops a hall from opening omits the line for staffing, that is a gap worth pricing.
Save this analysis and keep the funds you follow together in My Desk.
Sign in to save articles or follow funds.